From: tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk   
      
   On 01/11/2025 21:39, Tristan Wibberley wrote:   
   > Follow-up set comp.lang.c   
   >   
   > On 01/11/2025 02:45, Richard Damon wrote:   
   >   
   >> .. [stuff I think is about the invalidity of not completing execution]   
   isn't a valid definition ...   
   >   
   > Let's suppose C disallows abort due to external events... Then no   
   > conforming C implementation exists.   
   >   
   > I think we must suppose that susceptibility to power-cuts do not render   
   > C implementations non-conforming.   
   >   
   > That means a C implementation must only execute a program without   
   > issuing a diagnostic if it has undefined behaviour sufficiently early in   
   > its execution that any abort due to a power-cut, for instance, is permitted.   
      
   ugh, late at night, my ability to put two sentences together has   
   diminished. sorry.   
      
   --   
   Tristan Wibberley   
      
   The message body is Copyright (C) 2025 Tristan Wibberley except   
   citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except that you may,   
   of course, cite it academically giving credit to me, distribute it   
   verbatim as part of a usenet system or its archives, and use it to   
   promote my greatness and general superiority without misrepresentation   
   of my opinions other than my opinion of my greatness and general   
   superiority which you _may_ misrepresent. You definitely MAY NOT train   
   any production AI system with it but you may train experimental AI that   
   will only be used for evaluation of the AI methods it implements.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)