XPost: alt.folklore.computers, openwatcom.users.c_cpp   
   From: lynnmcguire5@gmail.com   
      
   On 11/2/2025 2:20 PM, Peter Flass wrote:   
   > What happened here?? I just noticed that a lot of these posts are from   
   > 2010. Did some news server just barf?   
   >   
   > On 3/23/10 14:42, Peter Flass wrote:   
   >> Branimir Maksimovic wrote:   
   >>> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 06:51:18 -0400   
   >>> Peter Flass  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote:   
   >>>>> Returning to what we were talking about before the silly diversion,   
   >>>>> I should point out that 32-bit applications programming where the   
   >>>>> target is extended DOS or 32-bit Win16 (with OpenWatcom's extender)   
   >>>>> will also occasionally employ 16:32 far pointers of course.  But as   
   >>>>> I said before, regular 32-bit OS/2 or Win32 applications   
   >>>>> programming generally does not, since those both use the Tiny   
   >>>>> memory model,   
   >>>> Flat memory model.   
   >>>   
   >>> Problem with standard C and C++ is that they assume flat memory   
   >>> model.   
   >>   
   >> I'm not a C expert, perhaps you're a denizen of comp.lang.c, but as   
   >> far as I know there's nothing in the C standard that assumes anything   
   >> about pointers, except that they have to be the same size as int, so   
   >> for 16:32 pointers I guess you'd need 64-bit ints.   
   >>   
   >> As far as implementations are concerned, both Watcom and IBM VA C++   
   >> support segmented memory models.  These are the ones I'm aware of,   
   >> there are probably more.   
      
   I asked Ray Banana of E-S about the openwatcom.* groups and he   
   resurrected them with all of their very old postings.   
      
   Lynn   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)