home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.lang.c      Meh, in C you gotta define EVERYTHING      243,242 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 241,795 of 243,242   
   Peter Flass to Scott Lurndal   
   Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C   
   04 Nov 25 09:39:41   
   
   XPost: alt.folklore.computers, openwatcom.users.c_cpp   
   From: Peter@Iron-Spring.com   
      
   On 11/4/25 08:20, Scott Lurndal wrote:   
   > Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> writes:   
   >> On 2025-11-03, Peter Flass  wrote:   
   >>> On 11/3/25 13:24, Lynn McGuire wrote:   
   >>   
   >> When I saw this subject line, I thought it was some necroposting to   
   >> threads from 1990.   
   >>   
   >> Someone still cared about segmented x86 shit in 2010 (even if 32 bit)?   
   >   
   > There are still people on the internet who swear that the 286 is   
   > better than sliced bread and refuse to recognize that modern   
   > architectures are superior.   
   >   
      
   I was thinking, are there any segmented architectures today? Most   
   disguise segmentation as a flat address space (e.g. IBM System/370 et.seq.)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca