XPost: comp.theory, comp.lang.c++   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 11/13/2025 4:18 AM, Janis Papanagnou wrote:   
   > On 13.11.2025 08:54, David Brown wrote:   
   >> On 13/11/2025 05:36, olcott wrote:   
   >>> [...]   
   >>   
   >> Given that you've been doing this for so many years, and got the same   
   >> results every time - everyone disagrees with your fundamental concepts -   
   >> what makes you think you can change people's minds by repeating the same   
   >> questions and claims?   
   >>   
   >> If you are wrong, and everyone else is right, then you are wasting your   
   >> time and everyone else's time.   
   >>   
   >> If you are right and everyone else is wrong, then your posts are /still/   
   >> wasting your time and everyone else's time.   
   >>   
   >> If you are sure you are correct, you have to find a different way to   
   >> prove it.  [...and so on, in a (IMO hopeless) try to get through...]   
   >   
   > You're probably assuming a normal, non-pathological case, since   
   > you're obviously trying it with sensible rational suggestions.   
   >   
   > If, for a moment, we'd presume - just as a working hypothesis - a   
   > pathological case then all such tries and suggestions are likely   
   > doomed to fail, and we need another way to handle that.   
   >   
   > So let's presume another hypothesis; making no replies to his posts   
   > results in no pathological floods of such posts. - I invite you all   
   > to do that so that we can see what happens, whether the hypothesis   
   > is correct or not. - If we're lucky, at some point there will be   
   > quietness again on this topic.   
   >   
   > And if he's still continuing just let a simple message-filter handle   
   > that.   
   >   
   > Janis   
   >   
      
   typedef int (*ptr)();   
   int HHH(ptr P);   
      
   int DD()   
   {   
      int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);   
      if (Halt_Status)   
        HERE: goto HERE;   
      return Halt_Status;   
   }   
      
   int main()   
   {   
      HHH(DD);   
   }   
      
   This code has been fully operational   
   for three years so I know what it does.   
      
   That no one else has been able to confirm   
   that DD simulated by HHH cannot possibly   
   reach its own "return" instruction has been   
   the issue that everyone has ignored or lied   
   about for three years.   
      
      
   --   
   Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius   
   hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)