XPost: comp.theory, comp.lang.c++   
   From: tth@none.invalid   
      
   On 11/24/25 17:45, olcott wrote:   
      
   >>> [000022e1] 33c0           xor eax,eax   
   >>> [000022e3] 5d             pop ebp   
   >>> [000022e4] c3             ret   
   >>> Size in bytes:(0033) [000022e4]   
   >>   
   >> That's right; even if HHH and HHH1 are separately realized and given   
   >> different adddresses, not recognized as identical by the compiler and   
   >> not folded into one copy, in a correct implementation of your software,   
   >> HHH(DD) and HHH1(DD) would behave as indistinguishable, mutually   
   >> interchangeable operations.   
      
   > Except when their input calls themself.   
   > In this case they must simulate themselves   
   > simulating their input, not just simulate   
   > their input.   
      
       I've got a Sun U5, with a Sparc64 CPU, and I'm thinking   
       about running your ultimate proof about the end of the   
       universe.   
      
       How portable is your software in this alternate universe?   
       And (this is just an absurd hypothesis, don't take it as a   
       personnal attack) can this famous proof of the end of the   
       world run on other deviant processors such as the z80 or   
       the ipax432 ?   
      
   --   
   **                                                            **   
   *                      tTh des Bourtoulots                     *   
   *                  http://maison.tth.netlib.re/                *   
   **                                                            **   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)