From: already5chosen@yahoo.com   
      
   On Tue, 25 Nov 2025 13:42:37 -0800   
   Keith Thompson  wrote:   
      
   > David Brown  writes:   
   > [...]   
   > > But the _BitInt version is definitely neater.  I can see myself   
   > > using _BitInt(12) and similar sizes for things like values read from   
   > > hardware sensors of different resolutions.   
   > >   
   > > (The code for all three is the same with gcc on x86 or arm64 -   
   > > unfortunately, gcc does not yet support _BitInt on many targets.)   
   > [...]   
   >   
   > Is support for _BitInt limited by target or by version?   
   >   
   > It looks like _BitInt support was introduced in gcc 14.1.0.  You might   
   > have older versions of gcc on other platforms.   
   >   
      
   The most recent version of arm-none-eabi-gcc in my distribution of   
   choice (msys2) is 13.3.0.   
   I am too lazy to compile arm-none-eabi-gcc from source. Would rather   
   wait.   
   I suppose, David is like me in that regard, except that he probably   
   uses even more conservative distribution.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)