From: pkk@spth.de   
      
   Looking at clang and gcc diagnostics:   
      
   // Tested via gcc/clang -Wall -pedantic -Warray-parameter -Warray-bounds   
   test.c   
      
   void f(char a[4])   
   {   
   	a[4] = 7; // clang doesn't warn. gcc warns with -O2/-O3 only   
   }   
      
   void g(void)   
   {   
   	char a[3];   
   	f(a); // gcc warns, clang doesn't.   
   	f(0); // neither gcc nor clang warn   
   }   
      
   So apparently passing a null pointer is considered less bad by gcc than   
   passing an array shorter than declared. And clang doesn't care about   
   anything here.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)