From: pkk@spth.de   
      
   Am 01.12.25 um 21:42 schrieb Keith Thompson:   
   >   
   > But given that several compilers have already implemented bit-precise   
   > integer types *without* either allowing N > BITINT_MAXWDITH or   
   > disallowing "odd" values, I don't think it will be an issue in   
   > practice.   
   >   
      
   There are extensions regarding _BitInt in existing implementations: SDCC   
   allows signed _BitInt(1), and allows the use of _BitInt as underlying   
   type for enum.   
   In --std-c23 mode, SDCC will emit a warning when encountering those, but   
   the semantics are of course the same as in --std-sdcc23 mode.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)