Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.c    |    Meh, in C you gotta define EVERYTHING    |    243,242 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 242,321 of 243,242    |
|    Bonita Montero to All    |
|    Re: Unicode...    |
|    03 Dec 25 06:24:23    |
      From: Bonita.Montero@gmail.com              Am 18.11.2025 um 21:17 schrieb Michael Sanders:       > Hi James, umm 'guarantees'? No no... It does NOT verify:       >       > - whether the environment actually supports UTF8 fully       > - whether multibyte functions are enabled       > - whether the terminal supports UTF8       > - whether the C library supports UTF8 normalization       > (combining characters, etc. but it seems to work well here)       >       > To be sure: It's not a UTF-8 capability test. It's only a       > locale-string check. So it likely misses many valid UTF8       > locale variants...       >       > Here I'm running any mixture of: Windows/BSD/Linix Mint LMDE.       Windows has the ...W() APIs along with codepage-based APIs with       the ...A() Suffix. The W()-APIs support UTF-16, so no need for              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca