Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.c    |    Meh, in C you gotta define EVERYTHING    |    243,242 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 242,337 of 243,242    |
|    olcott to Python    |
|    Olcott is provably correct --- no one ca    |
|    03 Dec 25 19:54:00    |
   
   XPost: sci.math, comp.theory, comp.lang.c++   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 12/1/2025 10:00 AM, Python wrote:   
   > Le 01/12/2025 à 16:55, olcott a écrit :   
   >>   
   >> In other words you are asserting that type theory is a lie?   
   >>   
   >> https://lawrencecpaulson.github.io/papers/Russells-mathematical-logic.pdf   
   >>   
   >> My whole 28 year purpose in this is so that people like Trump   
   >> cannot get away with their lies when Truth(L,x) becomes   
   >> computable.   
   >   
   > Adding more lies on top of previous lies, dodging, evading and defaming.   
   >   
   > This is not smelling good, maybe some smoke?   
   >   
   >   
      
   typedef int (*ptr)();   
   int HHH(ptr P);   
      
   int DD()   
   {   
    int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);   
    if (Halt_Status)   
    HERE: goto HERE;   
    return Halt_Status;   
   }   
      
   int main()   
   {   
    HHH(DD);   
   }   
      
   *Proof that HHH correctly rejects HHH*   
      
   (a) DD simulated by HHH according to the   
    semantics of the C programming language   
      
   (b) Cannot possibly reach its own "return"   
    statement final halt state   
      
   (c) While being simulated by HHH   
      
   Conclusively proves that behavior that the   
   input to HHH(DD) specifies is non-halting behavior.   
      
   That   
   (a) Turing machine deciders only compute the mapping   
    from their [finite string] inputs   
      
   (b) To an accept or reject state   
      
   (c) On the basis that this [finite string] input specifies   
    or fails to specify a semantic or syntactic property.   
      
   Proves that the halting problem, itself is incorrect   
   when it requires something else.   
      
   --   
   Copyright 2025 Olcott   
      
   My 28 year goal has been to make   
   "true on the basis of meaning" computable.   
      
   This required establishing a new foundation   
   for correct reasoning.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca