home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.lang.c      Meh, in C you gotta define EVERYTHING      243,242 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 242,484 of 243,242   
   Richard Heathfield to Keith Thompson   
   Re: 8 bit cpu   
   19 Dec 25 01:12:00   
   
   From: rjh@cpax.org.uk   
      
   On 18/12/2025 23:36, Keith Thompson wrote:   
   > BGB  writes:   
   > [...]   
   >> There are no "true" 8 bit systems in this sense, as pretty much every   
   >> existing 8-bit CPU has had support for 16-bit operations in some way,   
   >> though often by using register pairs.   
   >   
   > I vaguely recall reading about a true 8-bit system, maybe from the 1950s   
   > or so.   
   >   
   > It had a total of 8 bits of storage.   
      
   I wrote a computer that was wholly octet-based - *Everything* was   
   8-bit. 256 bytes of RAM, 256 bytes in a separate stack, and 256   
   8-bit registers. No support for any wider type. It's a few   
   hundred lines of C, nothing difficult. So 'There are no "true" 8   
   bit systems' might or might not be true of hardware, but it's not   
   true of software.   
      
   --   
   Richard Heathfield   
   Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk   
   "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999   
   Sig line 4 vacant - apply within   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca