Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.c    |    Meh, in C you gotta define EVERYTHING    |    243,242 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 242,516 of 243,242    |
|    Janis Papanagnou to James Kuyper    |
|    Re: srand(0)    |
|    22 Dec 25 13:18:19    |
      From: janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com              On 2025-12-22 12:44, James Kuyper wrote:       > On 2025-12-22 03:48, Michael Sanders wrote:       >> Is it incorrect to use 0 (zero) to seed srand()?       >>       >> int seed = (argc >= 2 && strlen(argv[1]) == 9)       >> ? atoi(argv[1])       >> : (int)(time(NULL) % 900000000 + 100000000);       >>       >> srand(seed);       >       > No, why whould you think so?              There's number sequence generators that produce 0 sequences if seeded       with 0. And maybe the comment in 'man 3 rand', "If no seed value is       provided, the rand() function is automatically seeded with a value       of 1.", may have fostered his doubt.              Janis              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca