From: janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com   
      
   On 2025-12-22 19:45, Michael S wrote:   
   > [...]   
   > In practice, using LFSR for rand() is not particularly bright idea for   
   > different reason: LFSR is a reasonably good PRNG for a single bit, but   
   > not when you want to generate a group of 31 pseudo-random bits. [...]   
      
   Please note that I've not suggested that.   
      
   I had been merely answering your question concerning Michael's doubts...   
      
    >> Is it incorrect to use 0 (zero) to seed srand()?   
    > No, why whould you think so?   
   There's number sequence generators that produce 0 sequences if seeded   
   with 0.   
      
   Janis   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)