Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.c    |    Meh, in C you gotta define EVERYTHING    |    243,242 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 242,626 of 243,242    |
|    Lew Pitcher to Lew Pitcher    |
|    Re: Unicode...    |
|    27 Dec 25 20:05:33    |
      From: lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca              On Sat, 27 Dec 2025 20:03:34 +0000, Lew Pitcher wrote:              > On Sat, 27 Dec 2025 20:47:37 +0100, Janis Papanagnou wrote:       >       >> On 2025-12-27 20:17, Scott Lurndal wrote:       >>>       >>> There is an ISO standard for 6-bit characters (ISO 646).       >>       >> I think you're confusing something here. ISO 646 (AKA IA5) is       >> a set of 7 bit character sets (with national variants) mostly       >> resembling ASCII.       >>       >> Janis       >       > If you trust Wikipedia, the article "Six Bit character code"       > (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six-bit_character_code) mentions       > that "ISO Recommendation R 646-1967" included a 6bit code, which       > was dropped when they issued ISO 646-1973.       >       > I have neither standard available, so I can't confirm. However,       > I should note that the ECMA still publishes (and makes freely       > available) their version of ISO 646: ECMA-006 "7 Bit coded       > Character Set".              Apparently, ECMA still publishes (and makes available for free download)       their 6-bit characterset standard: ECMA-001       (https://ecma-international.org/publications-and-standards/standards/ecma-1/)                            --       Lew Pitcher       "In Skills We Trust"       Not LLM output - I'm just like this.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca