From: bc@freeuk.com   
      
   On 01/01/2026 19:03, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:   
   > On Thu, 1 Jan 2026 14:05:29 +0000, bart wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 01/01/2026 01:03, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>> On Wed, 31 Dec 2025 22:57:55 +0000, bart wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> But, there is a difference between argv[0] and   
   >>>> GetModuleFileName().   
   >>>   
   >>> So the latter cannot be used as a simple substitute for the former,   
   >>> as you might have led us to believe.   
   >>   
   >> It depends on your needs.   
   >   
   > You neglected to mention that when offering the substitute before   
   > though, didn’t you?   
      
      
   FFS, why are you always looking for some argument?   
      
   Have the last word if you like. If it makes you happier, I will admit I   
   was deliberately misleading and totally wrong.   
      
   But about what, I don't know! FWIW, I first mentioned GetModuleFileName   
   as a possibility when argv[0] was not available.   
      
   So I now withdraw that suggestion. That means that if argv[0] isn't   
   available, then you're fucked, since there are apparently no workarounds   
   that would be 100% equivalent to what argv[0] would have provided.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)