Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.c    |    Meh, in C you gotta define EVERYTHING    |    243,242 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 242,696 of 243,242    |
|    Michael Sanders to All    |
|    Re: function pointer question    |
|    02 Jan 26 14:42:28    |
      From: porkchop@invalid.foo              On Fri, 2 Jan 2026 09:04:47 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:              > On Fri, 2 Jan 2026 07:24:55 -0000 (UTC), Michael Sanders wrote:       >       >> B: because every function must have a return type       >> *including function pointers*?       >       > Yes. The type of the function pointer is of course that of the type of       > functions it points to.       >       >> C: what about ty[p]edef?       >       > The same rule applies as with any typedef: put the name to be given to       > the type in the place where the variable you might be declaring of       > that type would go.              Many thanks Lawrence, slow & steady, I'm gaining steam.              --       :wq       Mike Sanders              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca