From: high.crew3868@fastmail.com   
      
   On 1/2/26 3:43 PM, Michael Sanders wrote:   
   > (It's also common to define a typedef for a   
   > pointer-to-function type, but I prefer to typedef the function type   
   > itself   
      
   OK, that's crazy! I didn't know of this!   
      
   It seems a bit weird at first, but I like the type consistency:   
   you declare `typedef int callback(int)` and declare `callback *c`   
   making it very explicit that we are talking of a pointer.   
      
   On the other hand it is not clear what `callback c` should do,   
   but it makes sense as soon as you declare it.   
      
   Thanks for sharing!   
      
   --   
   High Crew   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)