Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.c    |    Meh, in C you gotta define EVERYTHING    |    243,242 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 242,803 of 243,242    |
|    David Brown to James Kuyper    |
|    Re: printf and time_t    |
|    05 Jan 26 19:28:59    |
      From: david.brown@hesbynett.no              On 05/01/2026 19:11, James Kuyper wrote:       > On 2026-01-05 11:34, David Brown wrote:       > ...       >> As I understand it, time_t is intended to be suitable for holding a       >> number of seconds ...       >       > The standard says nothing about that.       >       >> ... (it is used for that purpose in struct timespec). ...       >       > The standard says nothing to connect time_t to struct timespec.              7.27.1p4:              The range and precision of times representable in clock_t and time_t are       implementation-defined. The timespec structure shall contain at least       the following members, in any order. The semantics of the members and       their normal ranges are expressed in the comments.               time_t tv_sec; // whole seconds -- >= 0        long tv_nsec; // nanoseconds -- [0, 999999999]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca