From: geoff@invalid.invalid   
      
   On Wed, 31 Dec 2025 15:14:27 -0800, Keith Thompson   
    wrote:   
      
   >It's entirely possible that Windows goes beyond the ISO C   
   >requirements and explicitly or implicitly guarantees argc>0.   
   >It's also entirely possible that it doesn't.  Do you have any   
   >concrete information one way or the other   
      
   https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/cpp/main-function-command-   
   ine-args?view=msvc-170   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)