From: Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com   
      
   Tim Rentsch writes:   
   > Keith Thompson writes:   
   >> Tim Rentsch writes:   
   [...]   
   >>> The program can be rejected, but not because of the rule about   
   >>> terminating a translation. The program can be rejected because   
   >>> the program is not strictly conforming, and implementations are   
   >>> not required to accept programs that are not strictly conforming.   
   >>   
   >> I disagree, but we've gone over this before with no resolution.   
   >   
   > Have you ever offered reasoning to explain your belief, or   
   > did you give just an unsupported conclusion? Can you explain   
   > the reasoning that underlies your disagreement?   
      
   I believe I have. I'm not interested in resurrecting that old   
   debate. Past experience indicates that no meaningful resolution   
   will be reached.   
      
   I'll note that you've posted a followup to something I wrote more   
   than eight months ago. That's one of several reasons I'm not   
   interested in a discussion.   
      
   --   
   Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com   
   void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|