From: tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com   
      
   Andrey Tarasevich  writes:   
      
   > On Tue 1/6/2026 7:58 AM, James Kuyper wrote:   
   >   
   >> However,   
   >>   
   >>       (void) *foo;   
   >>   
   >> would be a declaration equivalent to   
   >>   
   >>      void *foo;   
   >>   
   >> which is a pointer to void, which would fit the context of our previous   
   >> discussion.  Could that be what you're actually asking about?   
   >   
   > Um... I believe Tim Rentsch is correct in stating that C declaration   
   > syntax does not allow this. [...]   
      
   Thanks Andrey.  :)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)