XPost: sci.crypt   
   From: chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com   
      
   On 2/15/2026 2:05 PM, Stefan Claas wrote:   
   > Chris M. Thomasson wrote:   
   >> On 2/15/2026 12:58 PM, Stefan Claas wrote:   
   >>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:   
   >>>> On 2/15/2026 2:00 AM, Stefan Claas wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>> because best security pratices should be used when someone is offering   
   >>>>> online encryption, so that the site and owner can be trusted.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Well, one can download the files for the site and run it offline for   
   >>>> sure. No server, no internet connection needed. Fair enough? Btw, has   
   >>>> _your_ work been properly peer reviewed?   
   >>>   
   >>> Many thousands of people have seen it on reddit, in various forums,   
   >>> and no programmer there had complained. I showed it also to the   
   >>> guys of opentimestamps.org and they liked it too. You can show it   
   >>> to your Go friend, if you are unsure, or discuss it with your C   
   >>> friends on Usenet. You can also take a look at the source code,   
   >>> prior installing it on your website and I can tell you too that Go   
   >>> crypto libraries had an audit. The advantage of Go and Rust over C(++)   
   >>> is that those programming languages are made with security in mind   
   >>> unlike C(++) and others. So give it at try and you will be amazed.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> People seem to like my DrMoron on reddit as well. But, that is NOT a   
   >> proper review by professionals?   
   >>   
   >> https://www.reddit.com/r/crypto/comments/1r369lv/drmoron_a_cipher/   
   >   
   > You can do of course an audit by professionals, like cure53, wich cost   
   > money.   
   >   
   > https://cure53.de/   
   >   
      
   How much did you pay them?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)