Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.fortran    |    Putting John Backus on a giant pedestal    |    5,127 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 4,584 of 5,127    |
|    Lawrence D'Oliveiro to Lynn McGuire    |
|    Re: Intel Fortran Help in VS    |
|    26 Jan 24 08:50:59    |
      From: ldo@nz.invalid              On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 15:31:51 -0600, Lynn McGuire wrote:              > Much Fortran code was written under the F66 rules until the late 1980s       > if you supported multiple platforms (we supported ten platforms in the       > 1980s).              Why did it take vendors so long to catch up to FORTRAN 77?              By the way, I thought the limit on identifier length had been lifted in       FORTRAN 77, but I was wrong: it took until Fortran 90 to raise the limit       to 31.              > You can update it to longer names at your own peril.              Why is that still the case? Longer names have been allowed for going back       about a third of a century now.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca