Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.fortran    |    Putting John Backus on a giant pedestal    |    5,127 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 4,595 of 5,127    |
|    Lawrence D'Oliveiro to Gary Scott    |
|    Re: Intel Fortran Help in VS    |
|    27 Jan 24 04:43:44    |
      From: ldo@nz.invalid              On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 13:15:15 -0600, Gary Scott wrote:              > Harris VOS Fortran (~1980) had a lot of extensions beyond F77 that       > eventually went into F90 (long procedure/variable names (63 chars), free       > form source, full complement of end statements, async IO (although a       > different form), "Purdue" bit intrinsics (1753), and many others). They       > were way ahead of the standard, but there's always risk in adding       > extensions. These were however essential to make the systems usable for       > real-time programming (in addition to program priority control, process       > initiation/termination, hardware interrupt handling/processing, shared       > memory access and control, etc.)              Strange, isn’t it. PL/I was supposed to be the language with all of that--       I gather it was even going to be called “FORTRAN VI” at one point.              That never caught on much (outside of IBM). Yet Fortran has ended up       reinventing a lot of it.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca