Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.fortran    |    Putting John Backus on a giant pedestal    |    5,127 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 4,634 of 5,127    |
|    Gary Scott to Lawrence D'Oliveiro    |
|    Re: Number Literal Syntax    |
|    24 Feb 24 12:40:37    |
      From: garylscott@sbcglobal.net              On 2/23/2024 11:52 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:       > I see that Fortran uses the underscore in integer and real literals as a       > special suffix delimiter, followed by a code number or name to indicate       > the type of the literal. Pity they didn’t follow the convention in some       > other languages, where this is ignored so it can be used as a grouping       > delimiter, just for readability, to avoid the “drowning in digits”       effect.       > E.g. in Python this is a valid integer literal       >       > 18_446_744_073_709_551_615       >       > and this is a valid real literal:       >       > 3.141_592_653_589_793              In fixed form, probably 3.141 592 653 589 793              might have worked              I don't find this "drowning" problem to be a problem. In any case, the       common symbol for grouping numbers is the comma, although not typically       after the decimal point.              Sorry for the direct email sent to MM. Thunderbird changed the menu       such that the first option (reply (meaning reply to sender, not reply))       goes to email and the second option "followup" goes to group. I think       that's dumb, but you'd think I could remember it from one post to the       next :(              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca