home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.lang.fortran      Putting John Backus on a giant pedestal      5,127 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 4,644 of 5,127   
   Lawrence D'Oliveiro to All   
   =?UTF-8?B?4oCcSW1hZ2XigJ0gPSDigJxQcm9jZX   
   26 Feb 24 00:21:01   
   
   From: ldo@nz.invalid   
      
   Here’s another bit of terminology the Fortran spec seemed to feel the need   
   to invent for itself: talking about “images” to refer to running instances   
   of a program. I figured this either meant “thread” or “process”, but a   
   clue appears in the 2018 spec, section 11.4, “STOP and ERROR STOP   
   statements”:   
      
       When an image is terminated by a STOP or ERROR STOP statement, its   
       stop code, if any, is made available in a processor-dependent   
       manner. If the stop-code is an integer, it is recommended that the   
       value be used as the process exit status, if the processor   
       supports that concept.   
      
   So an image “terminates”, and returns a process “exit status”; this   
   must   
   mean that an “image” is equivalent to a “process”.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca