Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.fortran    |    Putting John Backus on a giant pedestal    |    5,127 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 4,644 of 5,127    |
|    Lawrence D'Oliveiro to All    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?4oCcSW1hZ2XigJ0gPSDigJxQcm9jZX    |
|    26 Feb 24 00:21:01    |
      From: ldo@nz.invalid              Here’s another bit of terminology the Fortran spec seemed to feel the need       to invent for itself: talking about “images” to refer to running instances       of a program. I figured this either meant “thread” or “process”, but a       clue appears in the 2018 spec, section 11.4, “STOP and ERROR STOP       statements”:               When an image is terminated by a STOP or ERROR STOP statement, its        stop code, if any, is made available in a processor-dependent        manner. If the stop-code is an integer, it is recommended that the        value be used as the process exit status, if the processor        supports that concept.              So an image “terminates”, and returns a process “exit status”; this       must       mean that an “image” is equivalent to a “process”.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca