From: pehache.7@gmail.com   
      
   Le 26/02/2024 à 01:17, Lawrence D'Oliveiro a écrit :   
   > On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 17:32:48 -0600, Gary Scott wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 2/25/2024 2:23 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> “Type-bound procedure” is not a term used anywhere else, and has to be   
   >>> explained. Other languages adding OO features stick to well-known   
   >>> terminology like “method”.   
   >>   
   >> LOL, if you understand english, it is quite explicit and clear.   
   >   
   > Note also that both “TYPE” and “CLASS” occur in Fortran, with   
   different   
   > meanings, while methods are normally associated with classes. Just to add   
   > to the confusion ...   
      
   Fortran terminology class/type/type-bound is logical and clear, and I   
   don't really mind if it differs from other langages. "type-bound   
   procedure" really tells what it is, much more than "method".   
      
      
      
      
   --   
   "...sois ouvert aux idées des autres pour peu qu'elles aillent dans le   
   même sens que les tiennes.", ST sur fr.bio.medecine   
   ST passe le mur du çon :    
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)