Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.fortran    |    Putting John Backus on a giant pedestal    |    5,127 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 4,702 of 5,127    |
|    R Daneel Olivaw to Steven G. Kargl    |
|    Re: Is there a way in Fortran to designa    |
|    03 Oct 24 19:02:23    |
      From: Danny@hyperspace.vogon.gov              Steven G. Kargl wrote:       > On Thu, 03 Oct 2024 14:45:31 +0200, R Daneel Olivaw wrote:       >       >> Lynn McGuire wrote:       >>> I need many of my integers to be integer*8 in my port to 64 bit. In       >>> C/C++ code, I can say 123456L to mean a long long value, generally 64       >>> bit. Is there a corresponding way to do this in Fortran or am I stuck       >>> with:       >>>       >>> call xyz (1)       >>>       >>> subroutine xyz (ivalue)       >>> integer*8 ivalue       >>> ...       >>> return end       >>>       >>> must be:       >>>       >>> integer*8 ivalue       >>> ...       >>> ivalue = 1       >>> call xyz (ivalue)       >>>       >>       >> This is not actually a Fortran issue as such, it's all about a specific       >> compiler (GNU Fortran).       >       > If we overlook the nonstandard type in the declaration, and agree       > that the compiler will accept 'integer*8', then the program is       > still invalid Fortran. It's technically not a Fortran issue. It       > is a programmer issue.       >              Take a pragmatic approach, if that's the way the compiler wants you to       do it then do it that way.       Years ago I was converting a suite of programs from one OS/hardware       platform to another. One program had serious problems because type       "real" had insufficient precision on the new machine, that machine       offered a compile option which meant "real" automatically meant "double       precision" and - after checking for "equivalence" and common" statements       - that's the way I went. Problem solved. This was back in the days of       Fortran IV but I don't think I've ever seen anyone assigning Hollerith       values to Real numbers so that was not a problem either.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca