Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.fortran    |    Putting John Backus on a giant pedestal    |    5,127 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 4,723 of 5,127    |
|    R Daneel Olivaw to Steven G. Kargl    |
|    Re: Is there a way in Fortran to designa    |
|    05 Oct 24 11:31:22    |
      From: Danny@hyperspace.vogon.gov              Steven G. Kargl wrote:       > On Fri, 04 Oct 2024 20:04:05 +0000, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:       >       >> On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 12:13:52 +0200, R Daneel Olivaw wrote:       >>       >>> but not as friendly as       >>> character*28 txthdr /'Text header, with a comma ' /       >>       >> With all these additions to Fortran, I keep wondering “when will they       >> finish reinventing PL/I?”. Because at an early point in the development       >> of PL/I, they were going to call it “FORTRAN VI”.       >>       >> One PL/I feature still missing from Fortran is VARYING strings.       >       > The above line of code in not standard conforming Fortran.       >              I have not fed it through the compiler I used to use (mainframe, and I       no longer have access) but that compiler conformed to Fortran77 to the       extent they did not even offer integer*8.       They did have some local extensions (statement functions) but they were       clearly marked as non-standard in the manuals.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca