Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.fortran    |    Putting John Backus on a giant pedestal    |    5,127 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 4,800 of 5,127    |
|    Steven G. Kargl to Lawrence D'Oliveiro    |
|    Re: Angle Units For Trig Functions    |
|    24 Oct 24 05:06:37    |
      From: sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu              On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 04:47:06 +0000, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:              > On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 02:17:15 -0000 (UTC), Steven G. Kargl wrote:       >       >> One of these values is wrong.       >       > Only if you assume the input numbers were somehow “exact” or       “perfect” to       > begin with.       >       > There’s an old principle in computing: “Garbage In, Garbage Out”.              People discussing Fortran normally use floating point math when       computing sin(x) or any other function of a "real" quantity.              >       >> You seem to be missing that argument reduction for sind(x)       >> is much easier than argument reduction for sin(x).       >       > But that only worked for one angle, and for nothing else.              ROFL.              For sin(x), argument reduction will give sin(0) = 0, exactly.       That's one angle.              For sind(x), argument reduction will give sind(x) = 0, exactly,       for countable many angles.              --       steve              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca