From: ldo@nz.invalid   
      
   On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 21:38:38 -0000 (UTC), Thomas Koenig wrote:   
      
   > Lawrence D'Oliveiro  schrieb:   
   >   
   >> On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 11:51:42 -0000 (UTC), Thomas Koenig wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> The "parameter adjustment" above is explicitly listed as undefined   
   >>> behavior, in annex J2 of n2596.pdf (for example):   
   >>>   
   >>> "Addition or subtraction of a pointer into, or just beyond, an array   
   >>> object and an integer type produces a result that does not point into,   
   >>> or just beyond, the same array object (6.5.6)."   
   >>   
   >> Read it again: note the qualification “that does not point into, or   
   >> just beyond, the same array object”. So long as it *does* point “into,   
   >> or just beyond, the same array object”, it is fine.   
   >   
   > What you are writing is equivalent to   
      
   You don’t understand what pointer arithmetic means, do you?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)