home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.lang.fortran      Putting John Backus on a giant pedestal      5,127 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 4,831 of 5,127   
   Lynn McGuire to Thomas Koenig   
   Re: in gfortran, is it faster compile ti   
   11 Nov 24 17:09:32   
   
   From: lynnmcguire5@gmail.com   
      
   On 11/11/2024 4:01 PM, Thomas Koenig wrote:   
   > Lynn McGuire  schrieb:   
   >> In gfortran, is it faster compile times with *.mod files ?  Or is it   
   >> just as fast compiling to include the module interface information in   
   >> each subroutine / function file ?   
   >   
   > I haven't benchmarked this, but I think likely that there would only   
   > be a small difference.  Usually, the front end only takes a small part of   
   > compilation time (but there are pathological cases).   
   >   
   > In general, modules are better because of automatic checking.   
   > If you want to avoid recompilation cascades, submodules (where   
   > you can separate the definition from the implementation) might   
   > be worth looking into.   
   >   
   >> Is there any chance that gfortran will automatically generate and use   
   >> module files in the future like IVF ?   
   >   
   > Not sure what you're asking for.  Can you give an example?   
      
   1. you compile abc.f in IVF   
   2. IVF automagically creates an abc__genmod.f90 file in your release   
   subdirectory with the subroutine / function module interface in it   
      
   Thanks,   
   Lynn   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca