Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.fortran    |    Putting John Backus on a giant pedestal    |    5,127 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 4,852 of 5,127    |
|    R Daneel Olivaw to Lynn McGuire    |
|    Re: I am getting a strange error when co    |
|    18 Nov 24 12:50:28    |
      From: Danny@hyperspace.vogon.gov              Lynn McGuire wrote:       > On 11/12/2024 4:01 PM, baf wrote:       >> On 11/12/2024 12:43 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote:       >>>>>>>       >>>>>> If all of your general purpose subroutines and functions are in       >>>>>> modules, you don't need interfaces for them (one of the advantages       >>>>>> of modules).       >>>>>       >>>>> I have 6,000 subroutines in 5,000 files. All I did was put       >>>>> interfaces for about 2,600 of the subroutines into a single module.       >>>>>       >>>>> Lynn       >>>>>       >>>> A better alternative would be to put the subroutines in the module       >>>> and USE the module. Then you don't need the interfaces (the compiler       >>>> gets all of the interface information "automagically").       >>>       >>> 850,000 lines of code in a single file ? That would be a mess.       >>>       >>> Lynn       >>>       >> I wasn't suggesting a single module. Partition the subprograms into       >> meaningful subgroups. Also, as was indicated, you can use submodules       >> to avoid cascading compilation issues with a large number of modules.       >       > My father and two other engineer profs started developing the software       > back in 1968 on a Univac 1108. It had 32K words of data space and 32K       > words of code space. To build large software, we had to manually       > partition the software ourselves so that it would fit into those 32K       > words of code space. It was a major pain when somebody would update a       > subroutine and mess up the partition map.       >       > When I personally started working on the software in 1975, it was one of       > my jobs to update the huge partition map on the wall outside my bosses       > office. I used the big computer sheets and taped them together, about a       > hundred or so of the sheets.       >       > Never again.       >       > Lynn       >              Were you using @FOR (Fielddata) or @FTN (Ascii)?       Things became much simpler when multiple Ibanks and addresses over 0200       000 became possible (for @ftn, @for was abandoned at some point). I       think @ftn also permitted multiple Dbanks but I never used that, the       code generated was - by necessity - horrific.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca