Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.fortran    |    Putting John Backus on a giant pedestal    |    5,127 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 4,866 of 5,127    |
|    Lawrence D'Oliveiro to Wolfgang Agnes    |
|    Re: OT: unicode (Was: Re: Upcoming gfort    |
|    25 Nov 24 23:35:34    |
      From: ldo@nz.invalid              On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 08:35:48 -0300, Wolfgang Agnes wrote:              > It's a bit difficult to understand ``surrogates''.              The Unicode folks just decided that the ranges 0xD800-0xDBFF (1024 codes       of “high surrogates”) and 0xDC00-0xDFFF (1024 codes of “low       surrogates”)       would be used in pairs to represent codes above 0xFFFF in UTF-16 encoding.       This gives an additional 1024×1024 = 1048576 different codes, which should       be enough to cover the entire (current) Unicode range, which officially       goes up to 0x10FFFF. At least, that’s what they’re saying right now.              In the full UCS-4 encoding, those ranges are considered invalid.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca