Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.fortran    |    Putting John Backus on a giant pedestal    |    5,127 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 4,876 of 5,127    |
|    Steven G. Kargl to Lawrence D'Oliveiro    |
|    Re: writing a module file in gfortran 14    |
|    07 Dec 24 05:44:56    |
      From: sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu              On Thu, 05 Dec 2024 01:45:28 +0000, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:              > On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 18:40:08 -0600, Gary Scott wrote:       >       >> I think the design is correct in requiring the implicit none to be       >> repeated.       >       > The sooner that implicit “IMPLICIT NONE” is added to the standard, the       > better, I think.              IMPLICIT NONE is a part of the Fortran standard. It's been       a part for a very long time. Perhaps, you meant that IMPLICIT       NONE should be the default behavior. That will never happen.              --       steve              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca