From: garylscott@sbcglobal.net   
      
   On 12/4/2024 7:45 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:   
   > On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 18:40:08 -0600, Gary Scott wrote:   
   >   
   >> I think the design is correct in requiring the implicit none to be   
   >> repeated.   
   >   
   > The sooner that implicit “IMPLICIT NONE” is added to the standard, the   
   > better, I think.   
   >   
   > In the meantime, gfortran (which is all anybody seems to be using anyway)   
   > has “-fimplicit-none” ...   
      
   I've long favored that.  The consensus when it was discussed in the 90s   
   was that it would never happen.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)