Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.fortran    |    Putting John Backus on a giant pedestal    |    5,127 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 4,883 of 5,127    |
|    Lawrence D'Oliveiro to Steven G. Kargl    |
|    Re: writing a module file in gfortran 14    |
|    07 Dec 24 07:48:48    |
      From: ldo@nz.invalid              On Sat, 7 Dec 2024 05:44:56 -0000 (UTC), Steven G. Kargl wrote:              > On Thu, 05 Dec 2024 01:45:28 +0000, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:       >       >> On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 18:40:08 -0600, Gary Scott wrote:       >>       >>> I think the design is correct in requiring the implicit none to be       >>> repeated.       >>       >> The sooner that implicit “IMPLICIT NONE” is added to the standard, the       >> better, I think.       >       > IMPLICIT NONE is a part of the Fortran standard.              Note what I said: implicit “IMPLICIT NONE”.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca