Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.misc    |    General topics about computers not cover    |    21,759 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 20,034 of 21,759    |
|    a425couple to NefeshBarYochai    |
|    Re: After a year of extermination, Pales    |
|    11 Oct 24 09:19:28    |
      [continued from previous message]              support for the partition plan.[80] The US Senate was considering a       large aid package at the time, including 60 million dollars to       China.[81][82] Many nations reported pressure directed specifically at them:               United States (Vote: For): President Truman later noted, "The facts       were that not only were there pressure movements around the United       Nations unlike anything that had been seen there before, but that the       White House, too, was subjected to a constant barrage. I do not think I       ever had as much pressure and propaganda aimed at the White House as I       had in this instance. The persistence of a few of the extreme Zionist       leaders—actuated by political motives and engaging in political       threats—disturbed and annoyed me."[83]        India (Vote: Against): Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru spoke       with anger and contempt for the way the UN vote had been lined up. He       said the Zionists had tried to bribe India with millions and at the same       time his sister, Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit, the Indian ambassador to the UN,       had received daily warnings that her life was in danger unless "she       voted right".[84] Pandit occasionally hinted that something might change       in favour of the Zionists. But another Indian delegate, Kavallam       Pannikar, said that India would vote for the Arab side, because of their       large Muslim minority, although they knew that the Jews had a case.[85]        Liberia (Vote: For): Liberia's Ambassador to the United States       complained that the US delegation threatened aid cuts to several       countries.[86] Harvey S. Firestone, Jr., President of Firestone Natural       Rubber Company, with major holdings in the country, also pressured the       Liberian government[72][80]        Philippines (Vote: For): In the days before the vote, Philippines       representative General Carlos P. Romulo stated "We hold that the issue       is primarily moral. The issue is whether the United Nations should       accept responsibility for the enforcement of a policy which is clearly       repugnant to the valid nationalist aspirations of the people of       Palestine. The Philippines Government holds that the United Nations       ought not to accept such responsibility." After a phone call from       Washington, the representative was recalled and the Philippines' vote       changed.[80]        Haiti (Vote: For): The promise of a five million dollar loan may or       may not have secured Haiti's vote for partition.[87]        France (Vote: For): Shortly before the vote, France's delegate to the       United Nations was visited by Bernard Baruch, a long-term Jewish       supporter of the Democratic Party who, during the recent world war, had       been an economic adviser to President Roosevelt, and had latterly been       appointed by President Truman as United States ambassador to the newly       created UN Atomic Energy Commission. He was, privately, a supporter of       the Irgun and its front organization, the American League for a Free       Palestine. Baruch implied that a French failure to support the       resolution might block planned American aid to France, which was badly       needed for reconstruction, French currency reserves being exhausted and       its balance of payments heavily in deficit. Previously, to avoid       antagonising its Arab colonies, France had not publicly supported the       resolution. After considering the danger of American aid being withheld,       France finally voted in favour of it. So, too, did France's neighbours,       Belgium, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands.[70]        Venezuela (Vote: For): Carlos Eduardo Stolk, Chairman of the       Delegation of Venezuela, voted in favor of Resolution 181 .[88]        Cuba (Vote: Against): The Cuban delegation stated they would vote       against partition "in spite of pressure being brought to bear against       us" because they could not be party to coercing the majority in       Palestine.[89]        Siam (Absent): The credentials of the Siamese delegations were       cancelled after Siam voted against partition in committee on 25       November.[71][90]       There is also some evidence that Sam Zemurray put pressure on several       "banana republics" to change their votes.[91]              Reports of pressure against the Plan       According to the Israeli historian Benny Morris, Wasif Kamal, an Arab       Higher Committee official, tried to bribe a delegate to the United       Nations, perhaps a Russian.[92]              Concerning the welfare of Jews in Arab countries, a number of direct       threats were made:              Jamal Husseini promised, "The blood will flow like rivers in the Middle       East".[93]       Iraq’s prime minister Nuri al-Said told British diplomats that if the       United Nations solution was not "satisfactory", "severe measures should       be taken against all Jews in Arab countries".[94]       Concerning the welfare of Jews in Arab countries, a number of       predictions were made:              '"On 24 November the head of the Egyptian delegation to the General       Assembly, Muhammad Hussein Heykal Pasha, said that "the lives of       1,000,000 Jews in Moslem countries would be jeopardized by the       establishment of a Jewish state."[95] At the 29th Meeting of the UN Ad       Hoc Committee on Palestine on 24 November 1947, Dr Heykal Pasha, the       Egyptian delegate, said, "if the U.N decide to amputate a part of       Palestine in order to establish a Jewish state, no force on earth could       prevent blood from flowing there… Moreover… no force on earth can       confine it to the borders of Palestine itself… Jewish blood will       necessarily be shed elsewhere in the Arab world… to place in certain and       serious danger a million Jews." Mahmud Bey Fawzi (Egypt) said: "…       imposed partition was sure to result in bloodshed in Palestine and in       the rest of the Arab world".[96]       In a speech at the General Assembly Hall at Flushing Meadow, New York,       on Friday, 28 November 1947, Iraq’s Foreign Minister, Fadel Jamall,       included the following statement: "Partition imposed against the will of       the majority of the people will jeopardize peace and harmony in the       Middle East. Not only the uprising of the Arabs of Palestine is to be       expected, but the masses in the Arab world cannot be restrained. The       Arab-Jewish relationship in the Arab world will greatly deteriorate.       There are more Jews in the Arab world outside of Palestine than there       are in Palestine. In Iraq alone, we have about one hundred and fifty       thousand Jews who share with Moslems and Christians all the advantages       of political and economic rights. Harmony prevails among Moslems,       Christians and Jews. But any injustice imposed upon the Arabs of       Palestine will disturb the harmony among Jews and non-Jews in Iraq; it       will breed inter-religious prejudice and hatred."[97]       The Arab states warned the Western Powers that endorsement of the       partition plan might be met by either or both an oil embargo and       realignment of the Arab states with the Soviet Bloc.[98]              Final vote              The 1947 meeting at the General Assembly meeting place between 1946 and       1951 in Flushing, New York       On 29 November 1947, the United Nations General Assembly voted 33 to 13,       with 10 abstentions and 1 absent, in favour of the modified Partition       Plan. The final vote, consolidated here by modern United Nations       Regional Groups rather than contemporary groupings, was as follows:[99]                     How UN members voted on Palestine's partition in 1947        In favour        Abstained        Against        Absent       In favour (33 countries, 72% of total votes)       Latin American and Caribbean (13 countries):               Bolivia        Brazil        Costa Rica        Dominican Republic        Ecuador        Guatemala        Haiti        Nicaragua        Panama        Paraguay        Peru        Uruguay        Venezuela       Western European and Others (8 countries):                     [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca