Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.misc    |    General topics about computers not cover    |    21,759 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 20,048 of 21,759    |
|    Sylvia Else to All    |
|    Re: Security? What "Security"?    |
|    14 Oct 24 11:24:16    |
      XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy, misc.news.internet.discuss       From: sylvia@email.invalid              On 11-Oct-24 10:17 pm, Sn!pe wrote:       > My pet rock Gordon asserts that every networked device has a backdoor.       > Therefore, anything viewable in clear on that device is insecure and the       > quality of message encryption is moot.       >              An initial question is what exactly is meant by "backdoor". Any       networked device that is capable of remote update by the vendor can       presumably be updated by the vendor to do anything that any device on       your network can do. But this does not imply that anyone else can do       that. Of course it does mean that you security depends on the security       of the vendor, which is an unknown quantity. This is partly why the few       remotely updatable devices that I do own are fire-walled off from the       rest of my internal network.              Few networked devices accept incoming connections, for the simple reason       that they're unlikely to get past a gateway router. Most work by making       outgoing connections to the vendor's server. The better implementations       require an authenticated server certificate, which makes impersonation       of the vendor pretty much impossible. Without a certificate the       intending intruder may engage in something like a DNS cache poisoning       attack, but they have become more difficult over the years.              If one is to worry about back-doors, the main vulnerability is the       router itself, and this has indeed been a problem in the past,       especially where the ISP has the ability to update firmware or change       settings, because now one is dependent on the security of the ISP, which       is not always been up to the task.              Commercially supplied routers have a bad record of vulnerabilities. I       use a small single board computer as a gateway instead.              Sylvia.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca