Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.misc    |    General topics about computers not cover    |    21,759 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 20,248 of 21,759    |
|    Retrograde to All    |
|    the early teletype (1/2)    |
|    14 Nov 24 03:42:44    |
      From: fungus@amongus.com.invalid              From the «punchity punch punch» department:       Title: A Teletype by Any Other Name: The Early E-mail and Wordprocessor       Author: Al Williams       Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 15:00:37 +0000       Link: https://hackaday.com/2024/11/13/a-teletype-by-any-other-na       e-the-early-e-mail-and-wordprocessor/       Podcast Download URL: https://hackaday.com/wp-content/uploads/20       4/10/1024px-Flexowriter.jpg?w=400              [image 1]              Some brand names become the de facto name for the generic product. Xerox, for       example. Or Velcro[2]. Teletype was a trademark, but it has come to mean just       about any teleprinter communicating with another teleprinter or a computer. The       actual trademark belonged to The Teletype Corporation, part of Western       Electric, which was, of course, part of AT&T. But there were many other       companies that made teleprinters, some of which were very influential.              The teleprinter predates the computer by quite a bit. The original impetus for       their development was to reduce the need for skilled telegraph operators. In       addition, they found use as crude wordprocessors, although that term wouldn’t       be used for quite some time.              Telegraph       [image 4][4]An 1855 keyboard telegraph (public domain).              Early communication was done by making and breaking a circuit at one station to       signal a buzzer or other device at a distant station. Using dots and dashes,       you could efficiently send messages, but only if you were proficient at sending       and receiving Morse code. Sometimes, instead of a buzzer, the receiving device       would make marks on a paper — sort of like a strip recorder.              In the mid-1800s, several attempts were made to make machines that could print       characters remotely. There were various schemes, but the general idea was to       move a print head remotely and strike it against carbon paper to leave a letter       on a blank page.              By 1874, the Frenchman Èmile Baudot created a 5-bit code to represent       characters over a teleprinter line. Like some earlier systems, the code used       two shift characters to select uppercase letters (LTRS) and figures (FIGS).       This lets the 32 possible codes represent 26 letters, 10 digits, and a few       punctuation marks. However, if the receiver missed a shift character, the       message would garble badly. This was especially a problem over radio links.              Paper Tape              Donald Murray made a big improvement in 1901. Instead of directly sending       characters from a keyboard to the wire, his apparatus let the operator punch a       paper tape. Then a machine used the paper tape to send characters to the remote       station which would punch an identical tape. That tape could go through another       machine to print out the text on it. Murray rearranged the Baudot code       slightly, adding things we use today, like the carriage return and the line       feed.              The problem that remained was keeping the two ends of the circuit in sync. An       engineer working for the Morton Salt Company solved that problem, which Edward       Kleinschmidt independently improved. The basic idea had been around for a while       — using a start pulse to kick off each character — but these two patents       around       1919 made it work.              Patents              Instead of fighting a big patent war, the two companies, Morkrum (partly owned       by the owner of Morton Salt) and Klienschmitt, merged in 1924 and produced an       even better machine. This was the birth of the modern teleprinter. In fact, the       company that was formed from this merger would eventually become The Teletype       Corporation and was bought by AT&T in 1930 for $30 million in stock.              Some early teleprinters were page printers that typed on the page like a       typewriter. Others were tape printers that spit out a tape with letters on it.       Often, the tape had a gummed back so the operator could cut it into strips and       stick it to a telegram form, something you may have seen in old movies.              In addition to public telegrams, there were networks of commercial stations       known as Telex and TWX — precursors to modern e-mail. These networks were       like       a phone system for teleprinters. You’d dial a Telex number and send a message       to that machine. Many teleprinters had an internal wheel that a technician       could set (by breaking off tabs) to send a WRU code (who are you) in response       to a query. So connecting to the Hackaday Telex and sending WRU might reply       “HACKDAY.” In addition, you could ring a bell on the remote machine. So a       single bell might be a normal message, but ten bells might indicate an urgent       message.              Word Processing              While replacing telegraphs was an obvious use of teleprinter technology, you       might wonder how people could use these as crude word processors. The key was       the paper tape and a simple paper tape trick. A Baudot machine would have five       possible punches on one row of the tape. You can think of it as a binary number       from 00000 (no punch) to 11111 (all positions punched out). The trick is that       if all positions are punched out, the reader would ignore that position and       move on to the next character. They also usually had a code that would stop the       reading process.              This allowed you to do a few things. First, you could punch a tape and then       make many copies of the same document. If you made a mistake, you could       overpunch the tape to remove any unpunched holes and “delete” characters.       It       was also common to use several fully punched-out characters as a leader or a       trailer, which allowed you to line up two tapes and paste them together.              So, to insert something, you could identify about a dozen characters around the       insert and over-punch them. Then, you’d prepare another tape that had the new       text, including the characters you punched over. You’d start that tape with a       leader and end it with a trailer of fully punched positions. Then, you can cut       the old tape and splice the new tape’s leader and trailer over the parts you       punched out in the first step. A lot of work? Yes, but it’s way better than       retyping everything by hand.              Once you create your master tape, you could turn out many originals. You could       even do a sort of mail merge. Suppose I have a form letter reminding you to pay       your bill. The master tape would have a pause in key places. So, the operator       would do something like type the date, name, and address. Then, they would       press start. The tape would type “Dear ” and then read a stop code. The       operator could type the name and press start again. Now, the tape would run up       until a later point, and another stop code would let the operator enter the       account number and press start again. The next stop might be for the balance       due, and a final stop for the due date. Pretty revolutionary for the 1940s.              Really high-tech installations used two tapes, one loop with the form letter       and another unlooped tape with the input data. The operator did almost nothing,       and all the letters were printed automatically.              [image 6][6]An ASR-33 (CC-BY-SA-3.0[7] by [ArnoldReinhold])Of course, not all              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca