Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.misc    |    General topics about computers not cover    |    21,759 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 20,360 of 21,759    |
|    Lawrence D'Oliveiro to Richard Kettlewell    |
|    Re: [LINK] Calling time on DNSSEC?    |
|    03 Dec 24 06:14:06    |
      From: ldo@nz.invalid              On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 08:52:31 +0000, Richard Kettlewell wrote:              > DNS + TLS does solve it, sufficiently well. (Using TLS to include       > Internet PKI.)              Nobody uses PKI. TLS has a hole in it, in that the SNI, “Server Name       Indication” (the “Host:” line in the HTTP request header) has to be sent       unencrypted. This allows eavesdroppers, like authoritarian Government       regimes, to determine when you are trying to access a prohibited service,       and block it before the encrypted connection can be set up.              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca