Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.misc    |    General topics about computers not cover    |    21,759 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 20,487 of 21,759    |
|    D to Salvador Mirzo    |
|    Re: the mythology of work (2/3)    |
|    12 Feb 25 01:42:13    |
      [continued from previous message]              >others have more than they know what to do with. As profit is       >accumulated and the minimum threshold of wealth necessary to exert       >influence in society rises higher and higher, poverty becomes more and       >more debilitating. It is a form of exile--the cruelest form of exile, for       >you stay within society while being excluded from it. You can neither       >participate nor go anywhere else.       >Work doesn't just create poverty alongside wealth--it concentrates wealth       >in the hands of a few while spreading poverty far and wide. For every       >Bill Gates, a million people must live below the poverty line; for every       >Shell Oil, there has to be a Nigeria. The more we work, the more profit       >is accumulated from our labor, and the poorer we are compared to our       >exploiters.       >So in addition to creating wealth, work makes people poor. This is clear       >even before we factor in all the other ways work makes us poor: poor in       >self-determination, poor in free time, poor in health, poor in sense of       >self beyond our careers and bank accounts, poor in spirit.       >"Cost of living" estimates are misleading--there's little living going on       >at all! "Cost of working" is more like it, and it's not cheap.       >Everyone knows what housecleaners and dishwashers pay for being the       >backbone of our economy. All the scourges of poverty--addiction, broken       >families, poor health--are par for the course; the ones who survive these       >and somehow go on showing up on time are working miracles. Think what       >they could accomplish if they were free to apply that power to something       >other than earning profits for their employers!       >What about their employers, fortunate to be higher on the pyramid? You       >would think earning a higher salary would mean having more money and       >thus more freedom, but it's not that simple. Every job entails hidden       >costs: just as a dishwasher has to pay bus fare to and from work every       >day, a corporate lawyer has to be able to fly anywhere at a moment's       >notice, to maintain a country club membership for informal business       >meetings, to own a small mansion in which to entertain dinner guests       >that double as clients. This is why it's so difficult for middle-class       >workers to save up enough money to quit while they're ahead and get out       >of the rat race: trying to get ahead in the economy basically means       >running in place. At best, you might advance to a fancier treadmill, but       >you'll have to run faster to stay on it.       >And these merely financial costs of working are the least expensive. In       >one survey, people of all walks of life were asked how much money they       >would need to live the life they wanted; from pauper to patrician, they       >all answered approximately double whatever their current income was. So       >not only is money costly to obtain, but, like any addictive drug, it's       >less and less fulfilling! And the further up you get in the hierarchy,       >the more you have to fight to hold your place. The wealthy executive       >must abandon his unruly passions and his conscience, must convince       >himself that he deserves more than the unfortunates whose labor provides       >for his comfort, must smother his every impulse to question, to share,       >to imagine himself in others' shoes; if he doesn't, sooner or later some       >more ruthless contender replaces him. Both blue-collar and white-collar       >workers have to kill themselves to keep the jobs that keep them alive;       >it's just a question of physical or spiritual destruction.       >Those are the costs we pay individually, but there's also a global price       >to pay for all this working. Alongside the environmental costs, there       >are work-related illnesses, injuries, and deaths: every year we kill       >people by the thousand to sell hamburgers and health club memberships to       >the survivors. The US Department of Labor reported that twice as many       >people suffered fatal work injuries in 2001 as died in the September 11       >attacks, and that doesn't begin to take into account work-related       >illnesses. Above all, more exorbitant than any other price, there is the       >cost of never learning how to direct our own lives, never getting the       >chance to answer or even ask the question of what we would do with our       >time on this planet if it was up to us. We can never know how much we       >are giving up by settling for a world in which people are too busy, too       >poor, or too beaten down to do so.       >Why work, if it's so expensive? Everyone knows the answer--there's no       >other way to acquire the resources we need to survive, or for that       >matter to participate in society at all. All the earlier social forms       >that made other ways of life possible have been eradicated--they were       >stamped out by conquistadors, slave traders, and corporations that left       >neither tribe nor tradition nor ecosystem intact. Contrary to capitalist       >propaganda, free human beings don't crowd into factories for a pittance       >if they have other options, not even in return for name brand shoes and       >software. In working and shopping and paying bills, each of us helps       >perpetuate the conditions that necessitate these activities. Capitalism       >exists because we invest everything in it: all our energy and ingenuity       >in the marketplace, all our resources at the supermarket and in the       >stock market, all our attention in the media. To be more precise,       >capitalism exists because our daily activities are it. But would we       >continue to reproduce it if we felt we had another choice?       >On the contrary, instead of enabling people to achieve happiness, work       >fosters the worst kind of self-denial.       >Obeying teachers, bosses, the demands of the market--not to mention laws,       >parents' expectations, religious scriptures, social norms--we're       >conditioned from infancy to put our desires on hold. Following orders       >becomes an unconscious reflex, whether or not they are in our best       >interest; deferring to experts becomes second nature.       >Selling our time rather than doing things for their own sake, we come to       >evaluate our lives on the basis of how much we can get in exchange for       >them, not what we get out of them. As freelance slaves hawking our lives       >hour by hour, we think of ourselves as each having a price; the amount       >of the price becomes our measure of value. In that sense, we become       >commodities, just like toothpaste and toilet paper. What once was a       >human being is now an employee, in the same way that what once was a pig       >is now a pork chop. Our lives disappear, spent like the money for which       >we trade them.       >Most of us have become so used to giving up things that are precious to       >us that sacrifice has become our only way of expressing that we care       >about something. We martyr ourselves for ideas, causes, love of one       >another, even when these are supposed to help us find happiness.       >There are families, for example, in which people show affection by       >competing to be the one who gives up the most for the       >others. Gratification isn't just delayed, it's passed on from one       >generation to the next. The responsibility of finally enjoying all the       >happiness presumably saved up over years of thankless toil is deferred       >to the children; yet when they come of age, if they are to be seen as       >responsible adults, they too must begin working their fingers to the       >bone.       >But the buck has to stop somewhere.       >People work hard nowadays, that's for sure. Tying access to resources to       >market performance has caused unprecedented production and technological       >progress. Indeed, the market has monopolized access to our own creative              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca