Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.misc    |    General topics about computers not cover    |    21,759 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 20,767 of 21,759    |
|    Salvador Mirzo to nospam@example.net    |
|    Re: broken schools (2/2)    |
|    27 Feb 25 07:41:24    |
      [continued from previous message]              parties cannot do anything without money. But they're not companies:       they produce no product in the typical sense of the word. So where do       they money come from? It comes from corporations. Who makes decisions       in a company? The owner or the employees? (Who makes decisions in       society? The goverment or the real owners?)              So when people say that governments don't seem to work in favor of the       population, I remark precisely the above---if you owned a company, would       you let your employees have the final say in the decisions? That'd be       absurd; it's your company; you call the shots. Similarly, corporations       (who invest in most of the government officials' careers), should have       the final say in nearly everything.              What do corporations want? Almost nothing. Because they're in power.       The desire of those in power is to keep things as they are.              We can make a parallel here with the relationship between monarchies and       the church. The church partnered with kings because they were useful to       each other: kings won their power by the use of force, which attracts       the interest of any other entity of some meaningful power (such as the       church). Their partnership is then natural: the influence of the church       on the people was useful to install the idea that the power of kings had       divine origins.              The very idea of a constitutional monarchy comes from the industry: when       the industry realizes that it was their time to be at the top, they       naturally make up a system that reduces the power of the monarchies,       with the brilliant argument that individual guarantees are needed. So       republics arise and we can make the parallel that governments take the       function that the church had in their partnership with kings. People       now are busy trying to organize themselves by interacting with the       bureaucracy of governments---this is the civilized, legal, democratic       way of living.              There is, therefore, a natural conflict between public policy and the       interests of corporations. The reason governments have, in principle,       nearly all the power and still are so ineffective against corporation is       a fact that's very illuminating. No fact is a contradiction; all       paradoxes are only apparent.              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca