Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.misc    |    General topics about computers not cover    |    21,759 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 20,863 of 21,759    |
|    D to Salvador Mirzo    |
|    Re: UNIX systems    |
|    21 Mar 25 23:37:56    |
      From: nospam@example.net              On Fri, 21 Mar 2025, Salvador Mirzo wrote:              >>> Right now I get 1 hour, so 3 is a major upgrade. My notebook is quite       >>> new. It's a Lenovo 15IMH05 with 24 GiB of RAM.       >>       >> Hmm, sounds like something is wrong somewhere. I'd install powertop       >> and/or tlp and also make sure to disable Intel VMD in case it is       >> enabled in your bios.       >       > I run OpenBSD and I believe we don't have programs such as powertop or       > tlp around here. I'm going to look into the BIOS. There are some Intel       > features there that I could disable. Some virtualization technology. I       > have enabled them and I saw that the OpenBSD kernel notices them. But I       > doubt I use any of that.              Best of luck! OpenBSD is strange. On some things it is far ahead, while on       others, it is hopelessly antiquated if things are as you say. =(              >> With those three, you should be able to double your battery time at least.       >>       >> For me, the biggest difference was disabling intel VMD in the bios,       >> that made a huge difference.       >       > You give me hopes. :)              Let me know if it makes a difference for you! =)              >>> I run cwm, which is known as not having a virtual desktop thingies, but       >>> it's actually does. When I press super-1 I go to desktop 1. I created       >>> 4 virtual desktops (which is enough), but I think I could have at least       >>> 9 of them.       >> ...       >>> Yeah, these things are important---printer, scanner and wifi. Although       >>       >> I wonder if it is easy to get p/s/w on cwm without having to pull in       >> all of xfce under the hood? That would be awesome!       >       > What's p/s/w?              Print/scan/wireless.              >> True. But it would not be convenient for me. The wife would be angry with       >> network cables everywhere. ;)       >       > That was not the image I had in mind. I had in mind plugging an       > appliance into the outlet on a wall. I could perhaps take my computer       > from my desk and lay on the couch with it while I plug it to the outlet       > near the couch. Then it downloads and uploads stuff (like,       > automatically) and then I watch a little TV, say. It would take a       > little while because with my new offline-designed system, the downloads       > wouldn't take just a few seconds for USENET and community messages and       > e-mails; it would also download a few websites (up to a certain depth)       > and videos [interviews, conversations, lectures] and also songs (so that       > now I'd have them offline). So after, say, half an hour, I'd unplug it       > and get back to my desk to continue work. So maybe I'd only connect       > again the next day or whenever.       >       > I really enjoyed this picture.              Ahh got it! Yes, that makes much more sense. I wrote a script that plugs into       my       email program that enables me to download any link in an email and get the       download as an email itself. It's great! I get an email with a link to an       article, then I do not need to leave my email program. I just highlight the       link, press a button, and a minute later the article comes in text only mode,       as       an email. Pure bliss! =D              > The author used words like connecting your computer to an outlet like a       > vehicle that stops by a gas station to pump fuel.              Good analogy!              >> Haha... true. Well, if you are already into tui email, I think the       >> gains will be less. I suspect that alpine is not the most efficient       >> one. But I think it is perhaps a bit easier to get started with.       >       > It's probably easier than Gnus, but in my case I think investing even       > more into Gnus is the way to go. I wish it were easier to use. The       > best thing about Gnus is not actually Gnus itself, but the fact that       > it's well integrated with the most pleasurable text editor ever.              This should not be underestimated! It is a powerful feature indeed!              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca