Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.misc    |    General topics about computers not cover    |    21,759 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 21,258 of 21,759    |
|    Adrian Caspersz to Lawrence D'Oliveiro    |
|    Re: 3.2 Gigapixels    |
|    21 Jul 25 19:24:43    |
      From: email@here.invalid              On 24/06/2025 07:53, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:       > I can remember when reviews of digital cameras (including phone cameras)       > would decry the emphasis on more and more megapixels, saying there were       > other factors that went into the quality of the image, too.       >              > Well, astronomers might beg to disagree. They have just commissioned the       > world’s highest-resolution digital camera, at 3.2 gigapixels, as part of       > the Vera C Rubin telescope in the Atacama Desert in Chile.              Not in the sky but, various on-earth images up to 320 Gigapixel images       from about 13 years ago.              https://360gigapixels.com              > Who was Vera Rubin? She collected data on the peculiar movements of stars       > in the outermost parts of galaxies that led to the inescapable conclusion       > that 90% of the Universe is made of “dark matter” -- matter we cannot see       > directly, but whose gravitational influence can be seen in those stars.              I can directly see dark matter most nights, gravitational influence       helps as I fall into bed (prefer alcohol though, softer landing), and       stars and Tweety Pie dance around me head.              --       Adrian C              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca