Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.misc    |    General topics about computers not cover    |    21,759 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 21,656 of 21,759    |
|    Geoff Clare to All    |
|    Re: =?UTF-8?B?4oCcUm9jay1Tb2xpZOKAnQ==?=    |
|    22 Dec 25 13:38:24    |
      From: geoff@clare.See-My-Signature.invalid              Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:              > On Fri, 19 Dec 2025 13:32:25 +0000, Geoff Clare wrote:       >       >> A major exception to that is ZFS: native and very dependable in       >> FreeBSD (and works great as the root filesystem), but a horribly       >> fragile dkms mess in Linux.       >       > ZFS is a memory hog, though, isn’t it              Not really when compared to e.g. modern web browsers. IIRC the rule       of thumb with ZFS is to have at least 1GB of RAM for each TB of       storage. My old file/media server had 4.5TB of storage and 4GB of RAM       and worked fine. The new one has 6TB of storage and 16GB of RAM.       (Thankfully purchased months ago before RAM prices skyrocketed.)              > Best confined to a dedicated storage       > appliance, not something you want to run on a general-purpose machine.              My file/media server is effectively a dedicated "appliance" although       I built it myself instead of buying something off-the-shelf. However,       I believe plenty of people use FreeBSD with ZFS as a general purpose       desktop/laptop system.              > Fun fact: even Oracle will not offer ZFS on its own Linux distro, but       > it will give you btrfs instead.              No doubt because of the licensing issue that is the reason ZFS has to       be installed via dkms on Linux instead of being native.              --       Geoff Clare |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca