Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.misc    |    General topics about computers not cover    |    21,759 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 21,675 of 21,759    |
|    Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOlivei to Scott Dorsey    |
|    Re: Fallacies Advocating Software Bloat    |
|    24 Dec 25 22:51:11    |
      From: ldo@nz.invalid              On Wed, 24 Dec 2025 15:44:02 -0500 (EST), Scott Dorsey wrote:              > On Wed, 24 Dec 2025 19:02:02 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:       >>       >> What exactly does Plan9 get you?       >       > The ability to have as much stuff as possible running outside the       > kernel ring. The more stuff you can kick out of the kernel, the less       > stuff there is which can cause catastrophic failure when things go       > wrong.              Ah, the hoary old microkernel refrain. You’d think, after something       like four decades of repeating the same tired old claims without being       able to back them up, the microkernel fans would have given up by now.              > OSX started out adapting some of the Plan9 philosophy but it mostly       > turned into bloat and the current OSX kernel looks nothing like a       > classic microkernel.              Gee, I wonder why they succumbed to real-world evidence in that way ...              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca