XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy   
   From: nospam@nospam.invalid   
      
   In article , Andy Burnelli   
    wrote:   
      
   >   
   > >> Apple put cheap batteries in the iPhone and all your denials don't change   
   > >> that fact which is _easily_ proven simply by looking at the AH ratings.   
   > >   
   > > the ah rating has nothing to do with cheapness.   
   >   
   > There are _many_ news reports that Apple cheaped out on iPhone batteries.   
      
   no there aren't, and again, that's unrelated to ah ratings.   
      
      
   > That you're completely ignorant of battery charge/discharge cycles is   
   > typical for you iKooks, who only know what Apple marketing feeds you.   
      
   battery technology is the same for most modern devices (lithium ion or   
   lithium polymer), which means the cycle counts will be the same (aside   
   from individual variances).   
      
   further, cycle count is unrelated to ah rating.   
      
   you're very ignorant about a lot of things.   
      
   >   
   > > the batteries in both iphones and the 'better batteries in androids'   
   > > (weasel words) are lithium polymer batteries.   
   > >   
   > > the difference is that android hardware is less power efficient.   
   > >   
   > > now go look at the batteries in the cheap android phones.   
   >   
   > My _free_ Android phone   
      
   unless you stole it (something which cannot be ruled out), it wasn't   
   free.   
      
   > has a better battery than any battery ever put into   
   > any iPhone ever built,   
      
   you're delusional.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)