XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy   
   From: walterjones@invalid.nospam   
      
   badgolferman  wrote   
      
   >>They reduced the speed of the phone when the battery was getting   
   >>close to exhausted; a sensible thing to do, don't you agree?   
   >   
   > Only if the owner of the phone had been informed beforehand.  Perhaps   
   > providing a switch to let the owner decide if they want that option   
   > would have been prudent.  In this case they were found to be guilty of   
   > hiding what they were doing, which made owners upgrade to newer phones   
   > rather than just get new batteries.   
      
   Hi badgolferman,   
      
   Do you see what I mean about the iKooks not owning adult cognitive skills?   
      
   The fact is Apple screwed up on only "some" phone designs, such that Apple   
   should have cared about their customers and just recalled the phones.   
      
   But Apple would never do the decent thing to stand by their mistakes.   
   Apple _secretly_ throttled only some phones with only some OS versions.   
      
   That proves it's not the battery; but the iKooks can't comprehend that.   
      
   In addition, Apple secretly _backated_ the release notes, for which almost   
   forty attorneys general successfully sued Apple in addition to the class   
   action suit (and in addition to the French criminal prosecution).   
      
   Each of those statements is something anyone who is not ignorant would know   
   and yet, the iKooks are completely oblivious of all truths about Apple.   
      
   It's not a question of whether or not iKooks are oblivious to the truth.   
   It's only a question of why.   
      
   I think I know why, and I've said many times why I think why.   
      
    *But what do _you_ think is the reason iKooks are oblivious to the facts?*   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)