XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy
From: ankora1234567890@gmail.com
nospam wrote
>> Apparently no courts agreed with your case nor Applešs.
>
> nope, they settled.
Only an iKook with a child-like mind would think that Apple settled over a
billion dollars worth of criminal & civil cases - as a gesture of goodwill.
> further, no court can overrule the laws of physics
This statement, which completely ignores that only a small set of Apple
iPhones were affected, shows clearly how incredibly ignorant iKooks are.
>> What Apple did was
>> sneaky and limited the consumeršs control over their own device.
>
> how did it limit their control?
Only a child-like iKook would fail to comprehend that what Apple did was
legally reprehensible - which is why it cost Apple over a billion dollars.
> what apple did wad intended so that the
> user's device did *not* unexpectedly shut down, thereby making the
> device *more* useful.
Only a religious zealot iKook would fail to comprehend what any decent
company would have done is initiate a recall the moment they found out.
> further, sudden shutdowns risk data loss and hardware damage in extreme
cases.
Only an iKook would possibly claim that what Apple clearly did to hide
their incompetence in design of the affected iPhones - was to protect us.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
